Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

This is for encouragement, ideas, and support for people going through a faith transition no matter where you hope to end up. This is also the place to laugh, cry, and love together.
Post Reply
User avatar
whatififly
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 7:41 pm

Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by whatififly » Sat Jun 23, 2018 3:34 pm

I posted awhile ago about having my ultra-TBM in-laws living in my ward. DH and I still haven't verbally outed ourselves to them but we also haven't attended church in months now. MIL has noticed and is getting angry. She verbally attacked me at a family dinner and told me that I needed to be doing better for her grandkids. I said nothing and left. That's the biggest confrontation we've had. DH later told her that if she wants to talk then we will but that we don't want another outburst like that. So far she hasn't taken him up on it and doesn't know why we don't go anymore.

FIL said something to us recently about how we need to be improving our church attendance because we need the blessing of it in our lives. DH skirted the comment and I decided to be bold. I said that I wished a more accurate version of church history was taught at church and gave the example of the several versions of the first vision. He hadn't heard of it and was convinced it was anti-Mormon. I brought it up on LDS.org. He hasn't broached the subject since.

I've gotten some coldness from family but so far things are going better then I expected. I originally wanted to out ourselves via a letter, but DH is uncomfortable with that so this is our compromise. I don't say anything about church around them and smile and nod when they talk about it (it seems 50-60% of their conversations revolve around Mormonism...) and then come on here when necessary to vent. It has helped a lot! Thanks you guys! :P
“There is freedom waiting for you, on the breezes of the sky, and you ask "What if I fall?" Oh but my darling, what if you fly?” ― Erin Hanson

Proud Doubter of Dubious Doctrines

User avatar
Corsair
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:58 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by Corsair » Sat Jun 23, 2018 7:09 pm

I'm reading your ongoing drama with some trepidation because it sounds exactly like my family if my wife were to have a faith crisis. My MIL would unleash the powers of passive aggression largely like your MIL has done. Good luck finding a happy equilibrium with your in-laws.

User avatar
Zack Tacorin Dos
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:42 pm

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by Zack Tacorin Dos » Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:36 am

WhatIfIFly,

Your in-laws are seriously acting like immature brats. I read stories of devout Mormons acting like this all the time--having absolutely no clue when it comes to someone's lack of belief and healthy social boundaries.

Reading these stories I get the impression that this is the norm for devout Mormons, but my Mormons have behaved much better with me (devout wife excluded, 'cause my disbelief hit her so hard, and yeah, our relationship is much different than my relationship with all my other Mormons). So what's the deal? Do you think bad boundary behavior is the norm for devout Mormons, or is it just that the NOM, PostMo, ExMo communities tend to write about the bad behavior because that's what they need to vent about and get support for?

At any rate, I'm sorry you're dealing with in-laws acting like little children. Makes you wonder why they think that kind of behavior is going to help in any way. Does their Christ model this kind of behavior? If so, not a god I would find worthy of worship.

My best,
Zack
Last edited by Zack Tacorin Dos on Sun Jun 24, 2018 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Red Ryder
Posts: 4144
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:14 pm

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by Red Ryder » Sun Jun 24, 2018 11:40 am

Whatififly,

I think your strategy is working. With your MIL consider using a "problem" or two that you nor her can resolve. Then whenever she brings up church in conversation and climbs up on her high horse, all you ever have to do is pull out your problem card. You can preface your problem with the essays as your source and point back to LDS.org (as you did with your FIL).

Here's two examples:

🍆 Joseph married a mother and her daughter – Patty Bartlett Sessions and Sylvia Sessions Lyon.
Your confused because God said in Leviticus 20:14, “If a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burned with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.” (Also see Lev. 18:17.)

Ask your MIL to help you reconcile this.

🍆 Joseph married several sets of sisters (Huntingtons, Partridges, Johnsons, Lawrences). Your confused because God said in Leviticus 18:18: “Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister… to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her lifetime” Leviticus 18:18.

Ask your MIL to help you reconcile this. If she starts to parrot the excuse that these women must have been widows or “old maids” and their prophet was doing a favor to them by marrying them point out the idea that Joseph Smith somehow rescued his plural wives from being single is just not accurate. The fact of the matter is that Smith met the majority of his wives when they were just preteens or teenagers. In fact, about a quarter of Smith’s eventual wives (nine of them) were 12 or younger when Smith met them, even as young as 5 (Sarah Ann Whitney) or 6 (Nancy Winchester). Over the years, Smith nurtured these relationships until he married them.

Finally, loop all of these issues back to the church essays as the source of your "problems". Ask them to help you reconcile with belief.

This strategy works really well with the temple too. If asked why you don't go, explain that you keep getting weird vibes whenever you do endowments and that you find the whole thing weird and disturbing. The solution offered to you will be to GO MORE! Then you can tell everyone you prayed about it and felt that God answered your prayers by telling you he was fine with your limited participation.

Mormons can't solve problems when the church is the problem. It just creates an infinite loop of Sunday school answers. After time they will just stop starting the loop thus leaving you alone!
“It always devolves to Pantaloons. Always.” ~ Fluffy

“I switched baristas” ~ Lady Gaga

“Those who do not move do not notice their chains.” ~Rosa Luxemburg

Reuben
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by Reuben » Sun Jun 24, 2018 1:20 pm

Zack Tacorin Dos wrote:
Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:36 am
Reading these stories I get the impression that this is the norm for devout Mormons, but my Mormons have behaved much better with me (devout wife excluded, 'cause my disbelief hit her so hard, and yeah, our relationship is much different than my relationship with all my other Mormons). So what's the deal? Do you think bad boundary behavior is the norm for devout Mormons, or is it just that the NOM, PostMo, ExMo communities tend to write about the bad behavior because that's what they need to vent about and get support for?
Overall, I'd say bad responses are the minority, and support groups select for them.

I think most believing Mormons just don't (or can't) know what to do. If your unbelief doesn't make them afraid, they tend to either avoid you, avoid the subject, or fall back on short scripts that only work on believers and the "elect." The closer the relationship, though, the more fear, and the more likely you'll get a desperate response. But the closeness of those relationships often provides ways to mitigate that fear.

In-laws are tricky. They're close enough to be afraid, but not close enough for you to do much to assuage it. My wife handled her parents for me.
Learn to doubt the stories you tell about yourselves and your adversaries.

User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by deacon blues » Sun Jun 24, 2018 2:46 pm

Zack Tacorin Dos wrote:
Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:36 am
WhatIfIFly,

Your in-laws are seriously acting like immature brats. I read stories of devout Mormons acting like this all the time--having absolutely no clue when it comes to someone's lack of belief and healthy social boundaries.

Reading these stories I get the impression that this is the norm for devout Mormons, but my Mormons have behaved much better with me (devout wife excluded, 'cause my disbelief hit her so hard, and yeah, our relationship is much different than my relationship with all my other Mormons). So what's the deal? Do you think bad boundary behavior is the norm for devout Mormons, or is it just that the NOM, PostMo, ExMo communities tend to write about the bad behavior because that's what they need to vent about and get support for?

At any rate, I'm sorry you're dealing with in-laws acting like little children. Makes you wonder why they think that kind of behavior is going to help in any way. Does their Christ model this kind of behavior? If so, not a god I would find worthy of worship.

My best,
Zack
My wife and family treated me quite well when I came out. The minor exceptions included a daughter who got a little upset at first, but got over it quickly, and is as loving as ever, and a sister who, when I came out to her said something like, OK, but I never want to talk about it again. A couple of years later, after 2 of her kids became NOM's we had one discussion about them, which was a bit ironic. Members of the ward have been OK. There are occasional people pestering about attendance, but overall cool TBM's seem to stay cool; uncool TBM's get a little uncool. My NOM daughter gets a little pressure from her TBM in-laws.
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.

User avatar
slk
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:51 am

Re: Update abt TBM in laws in my ward

Post by slk » Fri Jun 29, 2018 9:12 am

So sorry you have to deal with in-laws in your ward. I used the same comment with my dad about the seven differing first vision accounts. And don't forget that JS didn't tell anyone about this for 10 years. Subtle tidbits of info like this gives people enough to chew on and later on might give them curiosity to look it up. Sounds like you're letting the in-laws know that you stand for truth and you're not going to be involved in weekly 3 hr sessions that perpetuate lies but unfortunately TBMs don't see it this way.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests