Conversion Therapy

This is for encouragement, ideas, and support for people going through a faith transition no matter where you hope to end up. This is also the place to laugh, cry, and love together.
Post Reply
User avatar
blazerb
Posts: 1614
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:35 pm

Conversion Therapy

Post by blazerb » Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:26 am

I don't see that anyone has posted about this yet. Our leaders are urging the Utah legislature not to ban conversion therapy for minors. It's everywhere, but here is one article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lds-church ... n-opposes/.

I would have thought that Oaks would know this does not work since he was president of BYU when they did all the awful experiments. I'm just sad.

User avatar
nibbler
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by nibbler » Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:06 pm

blazerb wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:26 am
I would have thought that Oaks would know this does not work since he was president of BYU when they did all the awful experiments. I'm just sad.
Maybe that's part of the reason they're fighting this. Similar practices occurred under Oaks' supervision and those practices are now considered illegal. It makes for bad optics. Of course I believe fighting the proposed law makes for even worse optics, but I'm no church leader.
We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.
– Anais Nin

User avatar
blazerb
Posts: 1614
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:35 pm

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by blazerb » Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:17 pm

I just learned that the experiments performed at BYU should be called "aversion therapy." My bad. Still conversion therapy causes suicidal ideation, without doubt.

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7112
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by Hagoth » Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:04 pm

nibbler wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:06 pm
blazerb wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:26 am
I would have thought that Oaks would know this does not work since he was president of BYU when they did all the awful experiments. I'm just sad.
Maybe that's part of the reason they're fighting this. Similar practices occurred under Oaks' supervision and those practices are now considered illegal. It makes for bad optics. Of course I believe fighting the proposed law makes for even worse optics, but I'm no church leader.
Or maybe Oaks believes that you need to keep trying until you get it right, regardless of the carnage strewn along the way.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
Red Ryder
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:14 pm

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by Red Ryder » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:54 pm

Here’s first hand accounts of the aversion therapy program at BYU.

https://youtu.be/Xm5iX5ngkzk
“It always devolves to Pantaloons. Always.” ~ Fluffy

“I switched baristas” ~ Lady Gaga

“Those who do not move do not notice their chains.” ~Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5078
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by moksha » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:53 pm

Wonder what the Church's position would be on religious deconversion therapy?
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
alas
Posts: 2371
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Conversion Therapy

Post by alas » Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:14 pm

Red Ryder wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:54 pm
Here’s first hand accounts of the aversion therapy program at BYU.

https://youtu.be/Xm5iX5ngkzk
Aversion therapy is a bit different than the conversion therapy this law is about.

Aversion therapy is when pain, nausea, or other averse stimuli is associated with an undesirable behavior. Such as conditioning the subject to associate sweet food with nausea to help an obese person with dieting. Or using an electable on your wrist to give yourself a small dose of pain when you have an obsessive compulsive thought. It has legitimate uses in psychology, but as far as my professor 40 years ago taught us, is unethical and useless in changing sexual orientation. So, according to the American Psychological Association, changing sexual preference isn’t one of the ethical uses of aversion therapy for at least the past 40 years.

Conversion therapy is when things like getting men to bond with other men as bros by playing basketball together is used to try to change sexual orientation. (Ho boy did I think that one was stupid when a fellow social worker was quitting his job and going to this other agency to to this) There have been several methods tried according to different theories as to the cause of homosexual behavior. If the psychologist thought a domineering mother cause homosexual behavior, then he would try some method of compensating for the supposed damage by the mother. Conversion therapy has also been held as useless and ineffective by the APA for over 40 years because when I was getting my psych degree in the early 80, I was taught that this kind of therapy had been proven ineffective. Now that we know the cause of homosexual behavior is probably some combination of genetics, prebirth hormonal conditions, possible exposure of the mother to certain chemical, and maybe some unknown environmental influences after birth, the various Freudian theories have been debunked.

At this point, any psychologist doing either type of therapy should be sued for malpractice.

But, I could rant about this for hours and it is bedtime.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests