Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5091
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Post by moksha » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:15 am

Genesis 2
10 A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and from there it parted and became four rivers. 11 The name of the first is Pishon; it encompasses the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 The gold of that land is good; bdellium and the onyx stone are there. 13 The name of the second river is Gihon; it encompasses the whole land of Cush. 14 The name of the third river is Tigris; it goes toward the east of Assyria. The fourth river is the Euphrates.
I was just wondering about the traveling group of Mormons who asked for a story to help boost their spirits on the trek to Missouri. Joseph Smith obliged them by pointing to a rock outcropping and declaring it to be the ancient site of the Garden of Eden. I was wondering how this piece of Mormon arcana would have faired if the travelers had an understanding of world geography and history. If they had known where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, as well as the Assyrian Empire, were located would they have taken that story as anything more than a tall tale?
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
nibbler
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Post by nibbler » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:27 am

We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly?
We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.
– Anais Nin

User avatar
Corsair
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:58 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Post by Corsair » Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:52 am

nibbler wrote:
Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:27 am
We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly?
LDS leaders and apologists prefer the article of faith, "We believe Joseph Smith to say the word of God as far as he is quoted correctly"

Joseph Smith probably assumed that the landscape had changed radically over the past 6000 years so that the rivers were no longer in the same place. This doesn't make him "right" in any real sense. It just makes it harder to demonstrate falsifiability.

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5091
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Post by moksha » Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:39 pm

If the Missouri story was no more than a soothing campfire tale, it speaks to the willingness of the LDS people to encapsulate just about every utterance of their leaders into holy writ. Reminds me of the scene from the Life of Brian where the people latch on to the cast-off sandal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka9mfZbTFbk
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

Bloodhound98
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:58 pm

Re: Geographical knowledge and the Missouri story

Post by Bloodhound98 » Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:04 pm

Too bad he wasn't around long enough to show where Jesus Christ visited. That would've been a neat tale as well.

I asked my TBM if we knew where Jesus visited the Native Lamanite Americans. He side Bountiful????

He was joking and at the same time really wondering. Lol

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests