Body as tangible as mans

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:44 pm

I’ve been ponderizing the idea that we believe god has a body of flesh and bones.

I’m not sure where this doctrine comes from. Can you scholars help an out brother out?
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

User avatar
Palerider
Posts: 2237
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:44 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Palerider » Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:43 pm

There are many Biblical scriptures that imply the doctrine but D&C 130:22 spells it out specifically. See also Moses 6:9

https://www.lds.org/scriptures/tg/god-b ... e?lang=eng
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily."

"Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light."

George Washington

User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:29 am

I appreciate the references Palerider and of course they are familiar. If we can accept that the Luke 24 account is an actual event then this would be the most compelling evidence. I was wondering in our day of the fulfillment of all things, if there wasn’t a witnessed event something like that in Luke.

As far as I’m aware the first vision(or was it the second or third variation) that Joseph saw god. Is there anything about touching or eating together that would substantiate the notion of a body as tangible as mans?
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

User avatar
Palerider
Posts: 2237
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:44 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Palerider » Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:51 pm

I think there are a few accounts over the years of leadership seeing Christ, mostly in the temple. The one of Lorenz Snow comes to mind but has been questioned for authenticity.

https://www.lds.org/ensign/2015/09/a-vi ... r?lang=eng

Personally I find any supposed visitation to be scripturally unfounded. Whether in or out of the church.

If I recall the Biblical scriptures indicate Christ would not return or be seen again until He would do so in glory. Thus I put little stock in the visions of overwrought men or women who desire visions for their own sake rather than a relationship with Christ via the Holy Ghost.
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily."

"Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light."

George Washington

User avatar
Rob4Hope
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Salt Lake City -- the Motherland!!

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Rob4Hope » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:43 pm

Back in my TBM days, I remember having the column where the alleged appearance of Christ to Lorenzo Snow happened pointed out to me in the temple. I didn't know at the time the story came through his granddaughter years after it allegedly occurred either. And since that time, I've become aware of the MASSIVE backdating/changes to revelation that have happened to change the narrative. So to me, I can't look at ANY LDS doctrine/theology as happening as written, or even claimed. There are people who have claimed that things have happened just as they are written--unchanged. And the evidence that shows changes is so ridiculously blatant I have been stripped of being able to believe anything said by LDS authority now.

I think there is value in the teachings about being loving, kind, and honest which are NOT exclusively LDS. I think the LDS church teaching about God's body being tangle as man is surrounded with so much swirling obfuscation and crap it is utterly not possible to believe it, let alone even accept it is anything more than a narrative change to keep JS in power.

User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:26 pm

I’m not trying to beat this to death and my personal thoughts continue to be that all “doctrine” of all churches is the philosophy of men mingled with more imaginations of men.

I’m still wondering where our church came up with this idea. The accounts of the risen christ being touched and eating seem to be the last time anything points to this. I’m no expert in christianity but I think most of that persuasion believe jesus (heyzoos) left that body and resumed his hard to understand position in the trinity.

Us Mormon’s testify with passion that both god and heyzoos are clothed with flesh and bones. But I can’t seem to find any reasonable evidence in our modern experience.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

User avatar
Spicy McHaggis
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:14 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Spicy McHaggis » Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:52 pm

How does god transport that body through space and time, from Kolob to Earth and back again?

Kolob doesn't seem to be anywhere near our solar system so I'm guessing Kolob would be hundreds of thousands of light years away (at least). If it takes light a few hundred thousand years to travel across space, how does god & Jesus, with their bodies of flesh and bone, do it instantaneously? Teletransporters? Maybe the story is made up?

User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3630
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by wtfluff » Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:43 pm

D&C 130:22

The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

You can surrender without a prayer...

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by moksha » Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:09 am

Spicy McHaggis wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:52 pm
How does god transport that body through space and time, from Kolob to Earth and back again?
It is transcending the limitations placed on the acceleration of matter via Heisenberg Compensators which proves it is all so true. "Take us to warp-1830, Number One", is all God has to say.

When 2 Chronicles 2:6 suggests that even the Heavens cannot contain God, it was referring to the impossibility of a 3-D man of flesh and bone being effectual across the 9 tightly woven dimensions. The Chronicles writer had obviously not taken into account the Heisenberg Compensators.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
Rob4Hope
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Salt Lake City -- the Motherland!!

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Rob4Hope » Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:25 am

wtfluff wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:43 pm
D&C 130:22

The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us.
I hate this scripture because it means the Holy Ghost possesses us. We are liked "Possessed!". Wasn't like the Exorcist movie about something like that? But its OK if its the Holy Ghost.

And how can I be influence by having the Spirit of Christ in the room with me? In't Christ's spirit in his body?...so his body is there or what? And how can the Spirit of Christ be in one meeting and at the same time in another meeting?...cuz its impossible according to JS for a resurrected being to be in two places at exactly the same time.

Oh. I remember now. "Its a miracle". God can do whatever he wants, and we just need to have faith.

I'm ok now. :-)

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by moksha » Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:10 am

sciencebird wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:09 am
The Chronicles writer had obviously not taken into account the Heisenberg Compensators.
Besides the Compensators, no thought was given to the Infinite Improbability Drive, which was first mentioned in the Sundance Film Festival award-winning documentary Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

Reuben
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Reuben » Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:54 am

No Tof wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:26 pm
I’m not trying to beat this to death and my personal thoughts continue to be that all “doctrine” of all churches is the philosophy of men mingled with more imaginations of men.

I’m still wondering where our church came up with this idea. The accounts of the risen christ being touched and eating seem to be the last time anything points to this. I’m no expert in christianity but I think most of that persuasion believe jesus (heyzoos) left that body and resumed his hard to understand position in the trinity.

Us Mormon’s testify with passion that both god and heyzoos are clothed with flesh and bones. But I can’t seem to find any reasonable evidence in our modern experience.
I think it arose from Joseph Smith wanting to exalt mankind to the level of God. (Whether for everyone's benefit or just his own is anyone's guess.) To do that, we have to change nature upon receipt of exaltation, or God has to change nature now, or both. Joseph struck a balance that accorded with his reading of scripture ("there are bodies celestial"): God's nature changed form but not glory to be more like ours, and our nature changes in glory but not form to become like God upon exaltation.

It still bothers me when Christians forget the glory part and focus on the form. To me, the idea that you can become like God in every way is one of the few unique things about Mormonism that's generally good.
Learn to doubt the stories you tell about yourselves and your adversaries.

User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:09 pm

Thanks for your comments everyone. Seems like it became scripture without any documented witness from anyone.

Strange that we hold this doctrine in such high esteem and as a unique proof of our place in the religious world without anything to back up our claim that is unique. Makes me remember Consiglieri’s RFM podcast about doctrines from nothing at all.

The idea that god is a simple being as described in our doctrines seems to be something dumbed down to make it easy to swallow.
I like the concept of god. I’m open to learn more but for now my thoughts toggle between doubtful and “if there is such a thing”, it’s definitely much different then what I believed.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

Reuben
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Reuben » Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:09 pm

No Tof wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:09 pm
Thanks for your comments everyone. Seems like it became scripture without any documented witness from anyone.
I think most Mormons would think the burden of proof has been met, because Joseph Smith said it.

What would you accept as evidence?
Learn to doubt the stories you tell about yourselves and your adversaries.

User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:41 pm

Reuben wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:09 pm
No Tof wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:09 pm
Thanks for your comments everyone. Seems like it became scripture without any documented witness from anyone.
I think most Mormons would think the burden of proof has been met, because Joseph Smith said it.

What would you accept as evidence?
That’s what I think is strange, even for TBMS. he may have written it in the D&C but didn’t even record an instance of touching or anything other then a vision which I interpret as a visual/psychological event.

To say god has a body in our dimension should IMO, have some kind of experiential reference. Whether you believe the source or not, I’m surprised at the lack of follow through.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

consiglieri
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:02 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by consiglieri » Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:27 pm

The idea that God has a body of flesh and bones shows up late in Joseph Smith's ministry. I suspect it comes from the belief he arrived at that God is a resurrected being from a prior world, as more fully set forth in the king Follett discourse. Because of this, I theorize that this passage of scripture in the doctrine and covenants is the only place in the canon that strongly suggests this doctrine. When you understand what is behind it, it suddenly seems much clearer, to me at least. I mean, where did god get a body of flesh and bones in the first place? For Jesus, the answer is simple. For God, the answer is a little more complex. At least that's my two cents!

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by moksha » Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:08 pm

Gods with bods was a necessary theological adjunct for the Celestial Polygamy Principle.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Hagoth » Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:43 pm

Palerider wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:51 pm
I think there are a few accounts over the years of leadership seeing Christ, mostly in the temple. The one of Lorenz Snow comes to mind but has been questioned for authenticity.
Here's my summary of a fascinating article that pretty much puts that old wives' tale to bed: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-A ... sp=sharing

Seven years after Lorenzo Snow's supposed face-to-face with Jesus, President Heber J. Grant was asked in a letter which church leaders had actually been visited personally by Jesus Christ. Grant responded, “I know of no instance where the Lord has appeared to an individual since His appearance to the Prophet Joseph Smith.” (First Presidency Letterpress Copybooks, Vol. 72)

No one since that time has claimed any such personal visitation either. So it all hinges on something that was included in one of Joseph's First Vision accounts but omitted from others. And even at that, Joseph made no claim of physical contact or anything else that proved physical presence. For all he knew, God and Jesus could have been cephalopods projecting humanoid holograms for his benefit.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by Hagoth » Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:46 pm

No Tof wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:09 pm
The idea that god is a simple being as described in our doctrines seems to be something dumbed down to make it easy to swallow.
We hear testimonies that God has a body of flesh and bone. I'd like to hear someone testify of God's body in even more human terms: "I know God has a body with nostril hair and a scrotum, and probably belly-button lint."
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
No Tof
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:54 am

Re: Body as tangible as mans

Post by No Tof » Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:24 pm

consiglieri wrote:
Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:27 pm
The idea that God has a body of flesh and bones shows up late in Joseph Smith's ministry. I suspect it comes from the belief he arrived at that God is a resurrected being from a prior world, as more fully set forth in the king Follett discourse. Because of this, I theorize that this passage of scripture in the doctrine and covenants is the only place in the canon that strongly suggests this doctrine. When you understand what is behind it, it suddenly seems much clearer, to me at least. I mean, where did god get a body of flesh and bones in the first place? For Jesus, the answer is simple. For God, the answer is a little more complex. At least that's my two cents!
Thanks for those two cents. The idea that this doctrine doesn’t show up well after JS’s vision seems to support the idea that that experience was only visual/psychological.

His account of the priesthood restoration by the laying on of hands from resurrected guys at least gave a basis to believe in tangible bodies. Jesus and god, not so much.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests