Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by moksha » Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:56 pm

Pretty sure President Nelson came out against evolution when he was still an apostle. Guess he was the ideal person to walk back the possibility of evolution given his medical background. He phrased his reservation against evolution without saying "thus saith the Lord" allowing the BYU biology department some dignity when they later attended professional conferences.

I am thankful that not one single LDS Authority has insisted the earth is flat. Professor Louis Midgley of BYU has given no indication that Elder Packer gave a red light to a FARMS hit piece on Carl Sagan.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
Raylan Givens
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 12:09 am

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Raylan Givens » Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:43 pm

moksha wrote:Pretty sure President Nelson came out against evolution when he was still an apostle. Guess he was the ideal person to walk back the possibility of evolution given his medical background. He phrased his reservation against evolution without saying "thus saith the Lord" allowing the BYU biology department some dignity when they later attended professional conferences.

I am thankful that not one single LDS Authority has insisted the earth is flat. Professor Louis Midgley of BYU has given no indication that Elder Packer gave a red light to a FARMS hit piece on Carl Sagan.
Joseph Fielding and others were very literal in their timeline and interpretation of how old the Earth is. The Church seems to have walked back on that and is comfortable letting people come up with their own opinion on this and other hard science issues (evolution, DNA and BOM).

The Church seems almost liberal compared to what I hear coming out of Evangelicalical/ Conservative Christianity.

I remember a guy I was teaching years who's biggest knock on the Church was how it was, "always changing." He also believed the Earth was 6,000 years old...


Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk


"Ah, you know, I think you use the Bible to do whatever the hell you like" - Raylan Givens

User avatar
jfro18
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by jfro18 » Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:38 pm

Raylan Givens wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:43 pm
Joseph Fielding and others were very literal in their timeline and interpretation of how old the Earth is. The Church seems to have walked back on that and is comfortable letting people come up with their own opinion on this and other hard science issues (evolution, DNA and BOM).
I saw this point made in the response to the CES Letter from a former CES instructor. He basically said you don't have to believe in a global flood or disbelieve in evolution, etc to maintain belief in the church.

That's true in the sense that the church can no longer go out and make these claims because they simply do not hold up to what we know.

But then you're left with trying to explain how life began in Missouri yet got to Israel without a global flood. Or how the DNA of Native Americans is not from Israel, indicating that God was too stupid to know it or that Joseph Smith made it all up.

It's great to let members believe what they want about science because the church is in no position to make claims about it, but it opens up so many problems when the literal claims of the early church is no longer required.

User avatar
Ho Lee Turtle
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:08 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Ho Lee Turtle » Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:57 pm

Does Joesph Fielding Smith’s quote that man would never go to the moon count?

“We will never get a man into space. This earth is man's sphere and it was never intended that he should get away from it. The moon is a superior planet to the earth and it was never intended that man should go there. You can write it down in your books that this will never happen.”

User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3630
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by wtfluff » Mon Dec 31, 2018 9:16 pm

Ho Lee Turtle wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:57 pm
Does Joesph Fielding Smith’s quote that man would never go to the moon count?

“We will never get a man into space. This earth is man's sphere and it was never intended that he should get away from it. The moon is a superior planet to the earth and it was never intended that man should go there. You can write it down in your books that this will never happen.”
If we get to vote, I vote: YES.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

You can surrender without a prayer...

Thoughtful
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:54 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Thoughtful » Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:38 pm

Welp, if your coffee is too hot, it tastes like burnt chili beans, so that's pretty important.

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by moksha » Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:34 pm

Ho Lee Turtle wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:57 pm
Does Joesph Fielding Smith’s quote that man would never go to the moon count?

“We will never get a man into space. This earth is man's sphere and it was never intended that he should get away from it. The moon is a superior planet to the earth and it was never intended that man should go there. You can write it down in your books that this will never happen.”
The ironic side to this Joseph Fielding Smith quote was that it was said one month after Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin went into space. I would assume Elder Smith had not kept up with the news since it was in the headlines of the Deseret News and on KSL-TV. Maybe this was the Mormon version of climate denial at that time.

Image
The first man in space and Smith missed it.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by moksha » Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:38 pm

moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:34 pm
Maybe this was the Mormon version of climate denial at that time.
Speaking of climate change, what is the Mormon/LDS/Saints Church position on this? Any visions or revelations?
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2405
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by 2bizE » Tue Jan 01, 2019 8:35 pm

I think DNA is an ever improving science. I think it will help put the church out of business.
~2bizE

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Hagoth » Wed Jan 02, 2019 8:08 am

moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:34 pm
The first man in space and Smith missed it.
I wouldn't be surprised if he thought it was a hoax and the proof would be that WE (one nation under GOD) would never be able to put a man into space.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by RubinHighlander » Wed Jan 02, 2019 8:58 am

moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:38 pm
moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:34 pm
Maybe this was the Mormon version of climate denial at that time.
Speaking of climate change, what is the Mormon/LDS/Saints Church position on this? Any visions or revelations?
I think this is a topic of convenience for TSCC. They use natural disasters to drive fear into members about the last days narrative. But they turn around and play that narrative down when it suits them as well. Talking out both sides of their mouth with gas-lighting in full splendor.

From my view the conservative republican Mormons mostly support pro-capitalistic legislation that will support the bottom line of businesses that make the most money for them, because it's God's blessing for paying tithing; the global warming thing is just a consequence of the last days and Jesus will sort that out. There is this D&C scripture that tells TBMs they can keep having a plethora of babies because there's plenty of resources available:
D&C 104: 17 For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves.
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE

User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by RubinHighlander » Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:40 am

Corsair wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:39 am
Blessings of healing are not necessarily out, but no one expects them to work all by themselves without science-based medical care. Plus modern expectations for them are already so low that we now have Elder Bednar asking the critical question, "do you have the faith not to be healed?" I think they all quietly know that statistics are simply not on their side even if the blame is carefully placed on sin and lack of faith.
Here's the biggest study conducted so far on the power of prayer and it's lack of making a difference in major medical outcomes:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569567
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE

User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by RubinHighlander » Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:46 am

As far as the whole last days narrative, judge for yourself if you believe the world is getting worse and the last days are upon us:

https://ourworldindata.org/
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE

Reuben
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Reuben » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:59 am

RubinHighlander wrote:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:40 am
Corsair wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:39 am
Blessings of healing are not necessarily out, but no one expects them to work all by themselves without science-based medical care. Plus modern expectations for them are already so low that we now have Elder Bednar asking the critical question, "do you have the faith not to be healed?" I think they all quietly know that statistics are simply not on their side even if the blame is carefully placed on sin and lack of faith.
Here's the biggest study conducted so far on the power of prayer and it's lack of making a difference in major medical outcomes:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569567
Ah, but see, measurement in this case can affect the outcome, because measurement can change the mind of the agent (God) petitioned for a good outcome.

The only way around this problem that I can see is to try to force God's hand. An unethical way would be to use threats. ("Affect the outcomes positively, or we'll nuke this box of kittens.") An ethical way, though intractable, would be to log intercessory prayers for every operation everywhere, or at least focus on areas with a lot of believers. Basically, run this study everywhere God would do his work. Make him choose between staying under the radar and helping people.

We're kind of already doing that at Utah hospitals, where outcomes are recorded and a high percentage of patients pray for good outcomes. Either God isn't doing anything in them, or he stays statistically insignificant (so that he can't use good outcomes to influence beliefs on average), or he curses unbelievers in order to bless believers (which sounds pretty cranky), or he allocates blessings in a way that maximizes some God-only-knows objective.

Must be tough being God, always having to hide when your kids figure out new ways to observe you.

FWIW, I see the recent non-healing narratives as a manifestation of Mormonism culturally beginning to come to grips with the hidden god problem. I very much dislike the resolutions "believe it all anyway" and "the miracle is your continued belief," though.
Learn to doubt the stories you tell about yourselves and your adversaries.

User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3630
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by wtfluff » Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:15 am

Reuben wrote:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:59 am
RubinHighlander wrote:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 9:40 am
Here's the biggest study conducted so far on the power of prayer and it's lack of making a difference in major medical outcomes:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569567
Ah, but see, measurement in this case can affect the outcome, because measurement can change the mind of the agent (God) petitioned for a good outcome.

The only way around this problem that I can see is to try to force God's hand. An unethical way would be to use threats. ("Affect the outcomes positively, or we'll nuke this box of kittens.") An ethical way, though intractable, would be to log intercessory prayers for every operation everywhere, or at least focus on areas with a lot of believers. Basically, run this study everywhere God would do his work. Make him choose between staying under the radar and helping people.

We're kind of already doing that at Utah hospitals, where outcomes are recorded and a high percentage of patients pray for good outcomes. Either God isn't doing anything in them, or he stays statistically insignificant (so that he can't use good outcomes to influence beliefs on average), or he curses unbelievers in order to bless believers (which sounds pretty cranky), or he allocates blessings in a way that maximizes some God-only-knows objective.

Must be tough being God, always having to hide when your kids figure out new ways to observe you.
Well Reuben: "God's ways are not our ways. You just gotta have faith!"

Did I win at Thought-Terminating-Cliche'-Bingo with that statement? :P
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

You can surrender without a prayer...

User avatar
Palerider
Posts: 2237
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:44 am

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Palerider » Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:10 pm

If I recall Joseph Fielding Smith and others taught that most aspects of the Garden of Eden story were realistic. The telling of the creation of Adam being singularly symbolic as it states in the temple.

But this new article seems to step well beyond that to make room for just about anyone, whether evolutionist or creationist to feel cozy in the church. I think science has had a direct impact here. This article leaves the door wide open to all sorts of speculations.

Of course JFS is feeling the impact of the bus tires right now. But....who cares!?!? He's DEAD!

http://www.ldsliving.com/4-Elements-of- ... dium=email
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily."

"Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light."

George Washington

User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3630
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by wtfluff » Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:22 pm

moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:38 pm
Speaking of climate change, what is the Mormon/LDS/Saints Church position on this? Any visions or revelations?
The Moral Imperative of Environmental Stewardship

I haven't read the entire article closely, and I likely won't because I can't stand the flowery BS any more, but there is a quote in the article that is a bit shocking:
Climate change is real, and it’s our responsibility as stewards to do what we can to limit the damage done to God’s creation.
A bit of a change from: Jesus is going to be back the day after tomorrow, so we can do whatever we want to the earth 'cause he's gonna fix it all!
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

You can surrender without a prayer...

User avatar
alas
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by alas » Wed Jan 02, 2019 3:14 pm

wtfluff wrote:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:22 pm
moksha wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:38 pm
Speaking of climate change, what is the Mormon/LDS/Saints Church position on this? Any visions or revelations?
The Moral Imperative of Environmental Stewardship

I haven't read the entire article closely, and I likely won't because I can't stand the flowery BS any more, but there is a quote in the article that is a bit shocking:
Climate change is real, and it’s our responsibility as stewards to do what we can to limit the damage done to God’s creation.
A bit of a change from: Jesus is going to be back the day after tomorrow, so we can do whatever we want to the earth 'cause he's gonna fix it all!

The “God is going to come back and fix it all” idea has always struck me as childish and selfish. What are we, 2 year old babies that mess up our bedroom and depend on mama to come clean up. I don’t think so. I think we are more like teenagers and God is going to come back and just like Mom & Dad coming back from a weekend trip to find the teenaged kids threw a wild party and destroyed the house, God is going to be very very angry at what we have done to his earth that he spent billions of years making perfect for us and we destroy it in a couple of hundred years. Yup, God is going to be pissed, and yell at us to clean up the mess we made.

User avatar
crazyhamster
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:25 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by crazyhamster » Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:35 am

Ho Lee Turtle wrote:
Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:57 pm
Does Joesph Fielding Smith’s quote that man would never go to the moon count?

“We will never get a man into space. This earth is man's sphere and it was never intended that he should get away from it. The moon is a superior planet to the earth and it was never intended that man should go there. You can write it down in your books that this will never happen.”
I remember reading this a year or two after I was baptized. It was one of the first chinks in the armour of my testimony and something I often went back to in my times of doubt. Of course, over the years I had many other things to go back to as well, but I think this was the first big one.

Apologeticsislying
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:18 pm

Re: Areas where science has forced the church to change their story/approach/whatever?

Post by Apologeticsislying » Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:32 pm

Hagoth
That's because they mostly sidestep science altogether. Let us not forget Nelson's dismissal of both the big bang and evolution as "could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary?” Third grade creationist science denial at it's finest.
Well, I mean, he cut his education short and went into being a heart surgeon. I wonder what other "revealed" truths he will unveil at Conference this weekend...... perhaps the City of Enoch is on its way back so watch for the bright star in the skies....or perhaps Quakers on the moon have now advanced their own technology so they will visit the lost tribes on Mars this year! That would be gentlemanly of them. They can beat us earthlings to Mars because they have a higher priesthood, and......and........they have the 3rd anointed as spoken of on the 116 lost pages of the Book of Mormon. Through their righteousness, Moroni traveled there and gave the new edition, revised and improved over Smith's translation to them for their faithfulness.
The same energy that emerges from the fountain of eternity into time, is the Holy Grail at the center of the universe of the inexhaustible vitality in each of our hearts. The Holy Grail, like the Kingdom of God, is within. -Joseph Campbell-

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests