Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by Hagoth » Wed May 06, 2020 7:38 am

I get emails from Academia.edu alerting me to newly published papers they think I might be interested in. Today I got a notice for a paper called Death Before Adam, Evolution and the Pre-Adamites. An author is named but not a publication, so I'm guessing this is likely something written at BYU or BYU-I, maybe by a grad student, without any sort of peer review.

The introductory paragraph begins with:
Does the author “believe” in Evolution or in the idea of death before Adam? Belief is a strong statement. For sure, these ideas are favored ideas in my mind at the moment. I change my mind constantly when better information is had, and will certainly defer when a prophet gets revelation that would overturn this, or if I was instructed by priesthood authority to change my mind in order to retain my standing in the Church.
What a terrific summary of how of LDS apologetics works; staying in line with priesthood leaders must always trump reason and intellectual integrity. The author also points out that not all statements by church leaders are doctrine, which allows him to cherry pick the ones he likes.






In case you're interested, the author makes his case that, yes, humans evolved from lower forms and eventually developed into beings that were anatomically and mentally indistinguishable from fully modern human beings, BUT they were an entirely different family and, unlike us, are NOT GODS (author's capitalization). Pre-Adamites evolved in Africa but real people started with Adam and Eve, who were the legitimate spirit children of Elohim, created in Missouri. So evolution is true, but the doctrinal story is even truer... or whatever your priesthood authorities say is true or truer, dumb/dumber.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 1934
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by deacon blues » Wed May 06, 2020 8:43 am

I've heard that name before, so I googled it and came up with this: https://independent.academia.edu/EdwinGoble

I also liked this quote: "Elder James E. Talmage examined an altar of stones at Adam-Ondi-Ahman in Missouri “which
Joseph Smith identified as Adam's altar, and found fossilized animals in the stones.” So, the
conclusion made by Elder Talmage was that “if those stones be part of the first altar, Adam built
it of stones containing corpses, and therefore death must have prevailed in the earth before
Adam's time.”1 On August 9, 1931, James E. Talmage gave the talk “The Earth and Man” in the
Salt Lake Tabernacle that was later published in pamphlet form by the Church. That is not an
insignificant fact. Elder Talmage stated that “the earth passed through ages of preparation . . .
during which countless generations of plants and animals existed . . ., and gave in part the very
substance of their bodies to help form certain strata . . . These lived and died, age after age,
while the earth was yet unfit for human habitation.”2

This quote made we wonder "where have all the Talmadges gone?" They are certainly not found among general authorities of the church anymore. :cry:
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by Hagoth » Wed May 06, 2020 9:13 am

deacon blues wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 8:43 am
"Elder James E. Talmage examined an altar of stones at Adam-Ondi-Ahman in Missouri “which
Joseph Smith identified as Adam's altar, and found fossilized animals in the stones.”
Good for Talmage. He might just as easily have concluded that it was not the actual altar built by Adam but just rocks piled up by some rando, so the fossils could have been post-Adam. There is something kind of charming about Talmage's unquestioning acceptance of the Adam story alongside his rational observation of the physical evidence.

When I visited Adam-Ondi-Ahman as a TBM one of the first things I noticed was that the rocks there are chock full o' the fossils of tiny creatures. I wasn't quite sure what to make of it.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 1934
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by deacon blues » Wed May 06, 2020 9:51 am

One could consider the fossils as evidence of the flood, or as evidence of matter from another planet being recycled. Any temple-worthy view could be considered, which means the true interpretation would depend on what one’s particular bishop or stake president believed.It almost sounds like truth is related to bishop roulette.😇🤭🤔😟
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.

Apologeticsislying
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:18 pm

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by Apologeticsislying » Wed May 06, 2020 10:54 am

Ah yes, good ole Edwin Goble. Well evidence always trumps what one "feels" to be right, so to defer to priesthood authoritah without any evidence is ridiculous. It's evidence alone which has always established reality on our human scale. Nothing else has ever taken its place. Wishful thinking, doctrine, and authoritah are fundamentally irrelevant. This is why Mormons have been accused of being brainwashed.
The same energy that emerges from the fountain of eternity into time, is the Holy Grail at the center of the universe of the inexhaustible vitality in each of our hearts. The Holy Grail, like the Kingdom of God, is within. -Joseph Campbell-

User avatar
Yobispo
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:35 pm

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by Yobispo » Wed May 06, 2020 11:20 am

I hope that the author never has to face himself in the mirror and repeat these words, "Oh no, it was all made up and I wrote what??"

User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by RubinHighlander » Wed May 06, 2020 11:48 am

Kolob and Archaeo-astronomy
... Abraham actually understood both, and when he went to the Egyptians to preach, he did not preach specifically a geocentric cosmology as some LDS Apologists would have us believe. Rather, he was showing them how the symbolism in the geocentric cosmologies actually represents the grand reality, or the literal way we understand the universe now. Our cosmology has finally started to catch up with what Abraham and other ancient prophets knew.
Wow, look how well Bro Ed Gullible can take apologetics and shove it even deeper into the apologetics rabbit hole! He's like the epitome of an apologist enigma.
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE

User avatar
alas
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by alas » Thu May 07, 2020 8:53 am

Hawk girl has a blog over at Wheat and Tares all about conspiracy theories and the people who fall for conspiracy theories and how Mormonism makes people prone to believe conspiracy theories. It kind of applies to this discussion.

User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7076
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by Hagoth » Fri May 08, 2020 10:42 am

RubinHighlander wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 11:48 am
Kolob and Archaeo-astronomy
... Abraham actually understood both, and when he went to the Egyptians to preach, he did not preach specifically a geocentric cosmology as some LDS Apologists would have us believe. Rather, he was showing them how the symbolism in the geocentric cosmologies actually represents the grand reality, or the literal way we understand the universe now. Our cosmology has finally started to catch up with what Abraham and other ancient prophets knew.
Wow, look how well Bro Ed Gullible can take apologetics and shove it even deeper into the apologetics rabbit hole! He's like the epitome of an apologist enigma.
Yeah, I have heard that angle, that the BoA astronomy sounds silly because it's more advanced than current knowledge. Since it is right in line with 19th century speculation I guess we must be on the decline, despite our fancy telescopes and deep space probes (the Space Force branch of the Arm Of Flesh).
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."

User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5050
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Intellectually malleability, you know, for church standing

Post by moksha » Fri May 08, 2020 10:45 pm

Mormonism has also had a big effect on the politics of its members, especially in the States. How many groups can boast that its members are 'right' of Attila the Hun? It seems to me to be all intertwined with conspiracy theories and gullibility.

Well, at least Attila was not Trump.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 58 guests