I second Hagoth's endorsement of this podcast, and I hope you continue your series with Dehlin as was mentioned at the end.John Hamer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2020 7:36 pmBiblical scholarship (literary criticism) proves that the historicity of the Book of Mormon is not in question. Since the book is literarily dependent on the King James Bible (with italics) there is zero chance that it is anything other than a modern text. I explain the issue here:
https://www.mormonstories.org/podcast/j ... -creation/
Do you have any thoughts on the long ending of Mark? I believe from previous podcasts you believe it was added on later, but I've been reading some writings that claim the long ending was original and was spoken of by people before it was added on by scholars.
I tend to think the long ending was a late addition, but it's definitely an area where apologetics work overtime to give plausibility to it having been an original ending that ended up in the Book of Mormon.