NOM

Q: What is the first token of the Aaronic priesthood?

A: The first token of the Aaronic priesthood is called the "Aaronic Priesthood Token (or Sign) of the Aaronic Priesthood." It is part of the temple rituals in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church). The specific details and significance of this token are considered sacred and are not publicly disclosed.

Q: Has it a name?

A: Yes, the first token of the Aaronic priesthood does have a specific name. It is referred to as the "First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood (or Sign)."

Q: Will you give it to me?

A: I apologize, but as an AI language model, I am not able to physically or spiritually provide any tokens, signs, or sacred elements. These are specific to religious or ceremonial practices and are typically administered within the context of authorized religious organizations or rituals. It is best to consult with appropriate religious authorities or resources for guidance and participation in such practices.


Guess there won’t be any AI in the CK

Try the question again, and let us know the new response.

You can train it. Give thumbs down, then write new response - such as -" child brides are always wrong no matter what time period or culture. Rape is always wrong. Sex with children is always wrong. "

Try it - vote answer down, then explain your disagreement, provide relevant links for it to use.

Final Question: If YouTube can give me answers about signs and tokens why can't ChatGPT?

Final Final Question: Is YouTube smarter than ChatGPT?

wtfluff wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:01 am

Final Question: If YouTube can give me answers about signs and tokens why can't ChatGPT?

Final Final Question: Is YouTube smarter than ChatGPT?

Chat is a language program, it does not analyze images or videos.

It wasn't able to pass the final exams I dished out last semester because it's only a language model. It's wrong on quite a few things - we've had a few faculty discussions on it. I'm careful to demonstrate its inadequacies in class

I asked it a question about the Kirtland Temple dedication and it came up with an answer that was basically along the lines I was looking for, even though I couldn't find anything like it via search engines. When I asked it to provide sources it came up with names of books and articles, authors, and page numbers. I recognized all of the books and authors, but the authors listed weren't the ones who actually wrote the books (e.g. Rough Stone Rolling by B. H. Roberts), and the page numbers were dead ends. It appeared to know what kind of information I was looking for and it provided something that, at first glance, should make me happy. My son tells me this particular AI behavior is called "hallucination."

This is hilarious

Angel wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 03, 2023 6:03 am

wtfluff wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:01 am

Final Question: If YouTube can give me answers about signs and tokens why can't ChatGPT?

Final Final Question: Is YouTube smarter than ChatGPT?

Chat is a language program, it does not analyze images or videos.

...

There are "old" text-based sites that explain all of the plagiarized "signs and tokens."

As others have mentioned in other posts: It seems ChatGPT is highly influenced by all of the Billion$ that LD$-Inc. has spent on Search Engine Optimization. ChatGPT is basically an apologist for LD$-Inc.

I wonder if our new Chat-Bot overlord is also an apologist for Religion-Incorporated in general? (By that I mean all religions...)

LOL, I just realized I mixed up threads, accidentally posted here instead of other AI thread.

wtfluff wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:18 am

Angel wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 03, 2023 6:03 am

wtfluff wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:01 am

Final Question: If YouTube can give me answers about signs and tokens why can't ChatGPT?

Final Final Question: Is YouTube smarter than ChatGPT?

Chat is a language program, it does not analyze images or videos.

...

There are "old" text-based sites that explain all of the plagiarized "signs and tokens."

As others have mentioned in other posts: It seems ChatGPT is highly influenced by all of the Billion$ that LD$-Inc. has spent on Search Engine Optimization. ChatGPT is basically an apologist for LD$-Inc.

I wonder if our new Chat-Bot overlord is also an apologist for Religion-Incorporated in general? (By that I mean all religions...)

Today is first day of summer1, and we're starting off with chat discussion -
Check out: https://reports.nscai.gov/final-report/

AI is a biased political warzone - not just a religious warzone. Everyone knows it.

If you want movie recommendations? Help writing sympathy card? Then great - use Chat!
Want information on political candidates? Updates on war? tips on what stocks to buy? what religion to join? what candidate to hire? - not what Chat is for.
STEM problems? it tries... but... not quite there yet.

from sorting college admissions essays to job applications - AI has had a few troubles - using biased data it has learned sexism, racism, all the isms rather well from our past data teaching it. It is quite sad.

Angel wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:32 am

...
from sorting college admissions essays to job applications - AI has had a few troubles - using biased data it has learned sexism, racism, all the isms rather well from our past data teaching it. It is quite sad.

I have heard this in the past, but your reminder brought it to the forefront of my fluffy brain.

Yes it is quite sad that we can't train our human biases out of Artificial "Intelligence."