Another Holy Ghost?

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7382
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Another Holy Ghost?

Post by Hagoth »

I have never seen a good apologetic explanation of why Mormon worship was so drastically different in the early days. The early meetings were often chaotic riots of charismatic behaviors that included: speaking in tongues, collapsing into comatose states (in some instances they set up cots because they knew some people wouldn't be able to walk away for a day or so), demonic possessions, exorcisms, people dong backflips and swinging from the rafters, prophesying, visions, auditory hallucinations, etc.)

I would ask an apologist what element was different from today's worship.

Were they worshipping a different God? (apologist answer: NO!)
Were they receiving manifestations from a different Holy Ghost? (apologist answer: NO!)
Were they using a different sacrament? (apologist answer: OK, I'm going to change the subject now)
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by moksha »

Hagoth, thank you for broaching this subject!!!
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by wtfluff »

Hagoth wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:34 am ...
Were they receiving manifestations from a different Holy Ghost? (apologist answer: NO!)
...
Interesting. Since the first assistant to the CEO has admitted that there are heavenly motherS, maybe one of the other stooges on the board-of-directors will admit there are multiple ghosts of the Holy™ type floating around?

Maybe the original Holy the Ghost who was good at inciting way cooler "spiritual" experiences decided to retire and was replaced by a less enthusiastic Holy? Holy the Boring Ghost? Holy Junior?

(I should probably reiterate that I don't believe in ghosts.)
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 2124
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by deacon blues »

I'll give my dogmatic opinion:
1. Because they don't really talk to God. They talk to their biases.
2. Any revelation about the H.G. would mess with some TBM's biases.
3. the Holy Ghost is perhaps the ultimate example of Jello. He/It can't be nailed down. It's too amorphous, indeterminant, etc.
But I could be wrong.
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.
User avatar
alas
Posts: 2422
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by alas »

Different Holy Ghost. The wives rotate callings every few eons, just like at church.
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by moksha »

Mormons once postulated that Joseph Smith once held the Office of the Holy Ghost.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7382
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Another Holy Ghost?

Post by Hagoth »

The thing I was trying to draw attention to, of course, is the sacrament. Joseph would serve his special "mixed wine" sacrament, which attendees scooped with a cup from a bucket that was passed around. About an hour later people would start having visions, falling to the floor, vomiting uncontrollably (Samuel Smith), and behaving very oddly.

We are all familiar with the manifestations reported by attendees of the Kirtland temple dedication, but there are a couple of interesting things about this experience that most people don't realize. First, none of these happened in the actual daylight dedication meeting that was open to all members. They occurred in the after hours priesthood-only meeting, where the special sacrament was served in abundance. Second, we often hear about a number of miraculous visions that were reported, such as a rushing wind sound, tongues of flame appearing above peoples' heads, an angel flying into the room and seating himself on the stand (a very weird, hunched over old man with huge black eyes who was later identified as both Jesus and Moroni), etc. What we are never told is that the congregation did not experience these things as a group. Each of these was reported by a single individual, and later erroneously conflated to give the impression that they were group manifestations.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
Post Reply