NOM

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:13 am**

Palerider wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:42 pm
moksha wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:52 pm
The homoerotic art of Arnold Friberg in the Salt Lake Temple Visitors Center

I'm unfamiliar with any Friberg art that could imply homoeroticism. Can you give me a specific reference?

Imagine you are attracted to the male form and you are sitting in church surrounded by these:

AFri.png

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:19 am**

Funny story. In high school I gave one of my (closeted) gay friends a copy of the BOM. He said he really liked it. Most of these pics are in there.

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:21 am**

MoPag wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:13 am
Palerider wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:42 pm
moksha wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:52 pm
The homoerotic art of Arnold Friberg in the Salt Lake Temple Visitors Center

I'm unfamiliar with any Friberg art that could imply homoeroticism. Can you give me a specific reference?

Imagine you are attracted to the male form and you are sitting in church surrounded by these:

AFri.png

So apparently women in the church are having the same problem viewing these paintings??? If just the partially unclothed male body is such a turn on for women then the church must really be in the dark here.....this would practically be porn for women, right?

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:33 pm**

Palerider wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:21 am
MoPag wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:13 am
Palerider wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:42 pm

I'm unfamiliar with any Friberg art that could imply homoeroticism. Can you give me a specific reference?

Imagine you are attracted to the male form and you are sitting in church surrounded by these:

AFri.png

So apparently women in the church are having the same problem viewing these paintings??? If just the partially unclothed male body is such a turn on for women then the church must really be in the dark here.....this would practically be porn for women, right?

I can't speak for all women. The paintings don't turn me on. It's more like:

: thighs.png (154.76 KiB) Viewed 4261 times

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:40 pm**

MoPag wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:33 pm
Palerider wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:21 am
MoPag wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:13 am
Imagine you are attracted to the male form and you are sitting in church surrounded by these:

AFri.png

So apparently women in the church are having the same problem viewing these paintings??? If just the partially unclothed male body is such a turn on for women then the church must really be in the dark here.....this would practically be porn for women, right?
I can't speak for all women. The paintings don't turn me on. It's more like:
thighs.png

Then you're telling me this is an issue of people showing a little thought discipline?

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:17 pm**

Palerider wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:40 pm

Then you're telling me this is an issue of people showing a little thought discipline?

It's been known to happen.

But isn't it funny that a church that is so homophobic and sexually repressive decorates it's halls with very ripped very shirtless men?

NOM

The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression

Re: The LDS View of Art and Artistic Expression