That's what happened with ministering locally. No one really knew what to do without direction, so local leaders made it HT 2.0. They even started setting quorum goals to visit in the home to teach a lesson by the end of the month. Sound familiar?FiveFingerMnemonic wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:02 am Looks pretty vague. In my experience members struggle without specific standards and tasks being defined.
Historically I've seen two failings:FiveFingerMnemonic wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:02 am Kids choosing their own goals instead of it being spelled out probably won't work too great. Leaders will have to come up with stuff on their own which could get very interesting in some areas.
1) Adult leaders will call the quorum leaders together to hold another meeting in addition to the ones that they've already attended. Who wants to do another hour or two of church in addition to the 2 hour block, seminary every weekday, and a night of mutual? Why not hold the "what do you want to do?" meeting during the 2nd hour. Two birds and it addresses my next point.
2) The only people that get to give input on what the group will do are the two or three kids that hold a calling that allow them to have a voice. If they did the "what do you want to do?" meeting during the 2nd hour you'll potentially get input from more people. But that's a common problem all up and down the church. A small group of guys decide, no one else gets a say-so, their job is to follow.
It will be interesting to see what happens. The YM/YW program might dwindle down to nothing in some wards and in others it may become a program that's micro managed by the SP where kids have milestones that they have to check off, all with the end goal of serving a mission.