Gospel Doctrine Lesson report
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:16 pm
Gospel Doctrine report
Last week I was at a ward activity, and I started talking to the GD Teacher. I told her I was reading up on the lesson, and found some particularly interesting background on Thomas Marsh and Symonds Ryder. So she asked me if I would like to take 5-10 min of class and share what I learned. While she would probably not just ask just anybody to do this, I have a good relationship with her, as she was my RS pres while I was bishop. I gave her A LOT of autonomy while RS President, and she really appreciated it as she shared that with me when I was released and a new bishop was put in who she served with.
Anyway, back to class today. I used John Hammer’s 2009 By Common Consent post as the bases of my presentation, and also Ganeshji Cherian’s post at KiwiMormon.
I started out quoting Pres Uchtdorf’s 2013 talk about why people leave, with emphasis on the “It is not that simple” part of his talk. I then went over the typical milk story, then filled in the background on what really happened. I finished with this statement: “While it is true that Marsh left the church in 1838, and while Milk Stippings may have played a small part in it, the main reason was he was not able to reconcile the Mormon mobs and their looting with the gospel of Jesus Christ.”
I then took up Ryder, and said again it was not his misspelled name that caused him to leave the church, but that it was the coming of the United Order, and his fear of losing his land to the church. I then said it is easy to judge him now for being weak in his testimony, but how many in this class today would freely give all your property to the bishop if he asked for it. I then quoted Uchtdorf again and said “It is not that simple”
I closed by saying that in 35 years of leadership callings in the church, and meeting with literally hundreds of inactive people, and people that have left the church, I did not meet one person that left because they were offended. I said I’ve known people that have left because of the church’s stand on gay marriage, and about honesty issues with church history, but never because they were offended.
I got several comments from the people after class thanking me for giving the whole story. And the teacher asked me to sub for her next month!
Last week I was at a ward activity, and I started talking to the GD Teacher. I told her I was reading up on the lesson, and found some particularly interesting background on Thomas Marsh and Symonds Ryder. So she asked me if I would like to take 5-10 min of class and share what I learned. While she would probably not just ask just anybody to do this, I have a good relationship with her, as she was my RS pres while I was bishop. I gave her A LOT of autonomy while RS President, and she really appreciated it as she shared that with me when I was released and a new bishop was put in who she served with.
Anyway, back to class today. I used John Hammer’s 2009 By Common Consent post as the bases of my presentation, and also Ganeshji Cherian’s post at KiwiMormon.
I started out quoting Pres Uchtdorf’s 2013 talk about why people leave, with emphasis on the “It is not that simple” part of his talk. I then went over the typical milk story, then filled in the background on what really happened. I finished with this statement: “While it is true that Marsh left the church in 1838, and while Milk Stippings may have played a small part in it, the main reason was he was not able to reconcile the Mormon mobs and their looting with the gospel of Jesus Christ.”
I then took up Ryder, and said again it was not his misspelled name that caused him to leave the church, but that it was the coming of the United Order, and his fear of losing his land to the church. I then said it is easy to judge him now for being weak in his testimony, but how many in this class today would freely give all your property to the bishop if he asked for it. I then quoted Uchtdorf again and said “It is not that simple”
I closed by saying that in 35 years of leadership callings in the church, and meeting with literally hundreds of inactive people, and people that have left the church, I did not meet one person that left because they were offended. I said I’ve known people that have left because of the church’s stand on gay marriage, and about honesty issues with church history, but never because they were offended.
I got several comments from the people after class thanking me for giving the whole story. And the teacher asked me to sub for her next month!