Guilt culture and shame culture
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:27 pm
I thought this was fascinating. Todd Christofferson doesn't recognize that the church operates a powerful shame culture, by his own definition. The whole talk is interesting because he's taking the words that people use to criticize the church, redefines them, and then uses the same words to call critics out as hypocrites.
For example, calling critics out for being intolerant of the church's intolerance.
For example, calling critics out for being intolerant of the church's intolerance.
https://www.lds.org/general-conference/ ... of-warningTodd Christifferson wrote:Sometimes those who raise a warning voice are dismissed as judgmental. Paradoxically, however, those who claim truth is relative and moral standards are a matter of personal preference are often the same ones who most harshly criticize people who don’t accept the current norm of “correct thinking.” One writer referred to this as the “shame culture”:
“In a guilt culture you know you are good or bad by what your conscience feels. In a shame culture you know you are good or bad by what your community says about you, by whether it honors or excludes you. … [In the shame culture,] moral life is not built on the continuum of right and wrong; it’s built on the continuum of inclusion and exclusion. …
“… Everybody is perpetually insecure in a moral system based on inclusion and exclusion. There are no permanent standards, just the shifting judgment of the crowd. It is a culture of oversensitivity, overreaction and frequent moral panics, during which everybody feels compelled to go along. …
“The guilt culture could be harsh, but at least you could hate the sin and still love the sinner. The modern shame culture allegedly values inclusion and tolerance, but it can be strangely unmerciful to those who disagree and to those who don’t fit in.”