Liber societatis lunaris amicorum
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:44 am
I don't know enough Latin to write this whole post in Latin, and neither do you.
I was raised as a Mormon. My mother's parents are converts, and my father is of pioneer stock and has ancestors who were in Zion's Camp. So nearly all of my living relatives are believers. What a bind that put me in, when I discovered that the Mormon Church is false.
It began when I was looking to write a program that could do logic. Thus, I had to look up valid argument forms. The site I found to explain them also said unflattering things about Joseph Smith. One of my youth leaders had said something about the veracity of the Book of Mormon, and I had learned from school that the horse had only arrived in the Americas with the Europeans. With the combination of a wish to defend the Book of Mormon and the honour of Joseph Smith (!) I looked them up. On Wikipedia I found an article entitled "List of Joseph Smith's wives". I was never told that Joseph practised polygamy. I remembered reading in the History of the Church that he explicitly said that he didn't! I had thitherto found archaeological problems with the Book of Mormon, but the Wikipedia article also provided apologetic explanations, which satisfied me. But having found that Joseph Smith lied about his practice of polygamy, I resolved thenceforth to stop checking that the Church was true, but to check whether the Church was true. I found RfM, which contains large archives of grievances against mission presidents and bishops. From thence I found the CES letter and http://packham.n4m.org, which are lists of problems with the truth claims of the Church. Being somewhat interested in languages and linguistics, Packham's article "A Linguist Looks at Mormonism" resonated with me. The CES letter's sections on the Book of Abraham, the Kinderhook Plates, and Mark Hofmann completely blasted my belief in the Church.
In the midst of all this, I continued to read the original website, along with other articles on Packham's website, which combined to destroy my belief in Christianity. I found that the stories of Jesus are no better attested and evinced than the stories of Nephi. When reading the original website, I suddenly thought, as though an electric lamp were suddenly lit, "Agnostic atheism is the only reasonable position!" And even while I was still a believer, the thoughts had crossed my mind several times that "The main objective of the Church is to propagate the Church" and "I need a religion like I need a favourite sports team". (I had suppressed these thoughts, however, because it was sinful to think them.) All this happened by December 2014.
Probably to be continued....
I was raised as a Mormon. My mother's parents are converts, and my father is of pioneer stock and has ancestors who were in Zion's Camp. So nearly all of my living relatives are believers. What a bind that put me in, when I discovered that the Mormon Church is false.
It began when I was looking to write a program that could do logic. Thus, I had to look up valid argument forms. The site I found to explain them also said unflattering things about Joseph Smith. One of my youth leaders had said something about the veracity of the Book of Mormon, and I had learned from school that the horse had only arrived in the Americas with the Europeans. With the combination of a wish to defend the Book of Mormon and the honour of Joseph Smith (!) I looked them up. On Wikipedia I found an article entitled "List of Joseph Smith's wives". I was never told that Joseph practised polygamy. I remembered reading in the History of the Church that he explicitly said that he didn't! I had thitherto found archaeological problems with the Book of Mormon, but the Wikipedia article also provided apologetic explanations, which satisfied me. But having found that Joseph Smith lied about his practice of polygamy, I resolved thenceforth to stop checking that the Church was true, but to check whether the Church was true. I found RfM, which contains large archives of grievances against mission presidents and bishops. From thence I found the CES letter and http://packham.n4m.org, which are lists of problems with the truth claims of the Church. Being somewhat interested in languages and linguistics, Packham's article "A Linguist Looks at Mormonism" resonated with me. The CES letter's sections on the Book of Abraham, the Kinderhook Plates, and Mark Hofmann completely blasted my belief in the Church.
In the midst of all this, I continued to read the original website, along with other articles on Packham's website, which combined to destroy my belief in Christianity. I found that the stories of Jesus are no better attested and evinced than the stories of Nephi. When reading the original website, I suddenly thought, as though an electric lamp were suddenly lit, "Agnostic atheism is the only reasonable position!" And even while I was still a believer, the thoughts had crossed my mind several times that "The main objective of the Church is to propagate the Church" and "I need a religion like I need a favourite sports team". (I had suppressed these thoughts, however, because it was sinful to think them.) All this happened by December 2014.
Probably to be continued....