NOM

I was studying history this evening and I couldn’t help it when the thought above popped into my head: “Comrades, it is wrong to criticize Chairman “Beloved Leader” even if the criticism is true. In fairness no Mormon leader has ever even approached the harm caused by some Dictators in history, but the principle seems worthy of mention. Am I wrong?

I agree. Our country is in a better position to criticize those at the top, whereas the church seems to be less so unfortunately.

While our church leaders are not out to gain world power, much good can come when an organization requests and accepts criticism and uses it to improve. I think the LDS leaders are so insulated from criticism, they have lost their way of the realities of regular members of the church.