https://www.lds.org/ensign/2016/10/the- ... h?lang=eng
Highlights that I took issue with:
Not only was Joseph set on the traditions of his day, all of his theological constructs originated or were borrowed from them. I will concede that he re-used them in a newly creative way for his time.Some express concern that the President of the Church is likely always to be a rather elderly man, to which my response is, “What a blessing!” The work in this dispensation was first put in place through the instrumentality of the Prophet Joseph Smith. He was at the time young and vigorous, one whose mind was not set in the traditions of his day. His was a youthful mind which the Lord could mold as fresh, moist clay as He initiated His work.
Hinkley is essentially making excuses for the lack of current revelation by stating that we don't need innovation, and that the current crop of aging leadership is divinely mandated, in contrast to the young church that needed innovators. Interesting way to frame it for the faithful.Joseph’s successor was relatively young when he was faced with the terrible responsibility of leading an entire people across the wilderness to pioneer a new land.
But the basics of our doctrine are now well in place, and we are firmly established as a people, at least until the Lord should mandate another move. We do not need innovation. We need devotion in adherence to divinely spoken principles. We need loyalty to our leader, whom God has appointed. He is our prophet, our seer and revelator. We shall never be left without a prophet if we will live worthy of one. He does not need to be youthful. He has and will continue to have younger men to travel over the earth in the work of the ministry. He is the presiding high priest, the repository of all of the keys of the holy priesthood, and the voice of revelation from God to His people.
There is an old proverb which says, “Youth for action. Age for wisdom.”