We were talking to a TBM couple at dinner last night who's first comment was that the new policy was "25 years too late".
The church attempts to credit the change to the advent of wonderful new technology.... Like the telephone that has been around since the early 1900's....

Uchtdorf however made a little give away statement that I thought was interesting. He said, "He rejected the philosophy that calling home more than twice a year will weaken or distract missionaries."
Really??? Isn't that awfully brave of him to say it so bluntly?
I wonder who's "philosophy" that was in the first place?
I remember getting a letter from one of my sons while on his mission that betrayed a bit of discouragement and I called the MP to ask permission to chat with my son on the phone to encourage him. He said "No, there was no need and rules are rules. No communication with family allowed."
The way he said it was kind of like a jerk and it made me angry that someone in this world thought they could tell me I couldn't communicate with my own son if I thought the need was there. Years later after leaving the church, I came to see this as cult-like behavior.
So now TSCC is having a change of heart on their "philosophy"....?
I'm sure this is for the better if only because it helps them avoid the charge and label of being a cult. But something about it really stinks like a gut pile on a warm day.
I feel sure if I were to ask one of these GA's what in the world took them so long, I'd get the response that the church isn't perfect and this is just one of those "church culture" things that crept in and hung on for a long time. Nobody knows how or why. But isn't it grand that we are led by a prophet now....yada, yada, yada.
Not that this change is "revelation" mind you. It's just a matter of someone actually thinking about the policy and deciding it should change. But then how do we know this "thinking" now is the right way to go if it isn't revelation????
Yeah.... something about this really stinks in a bad, bad way.
